Nr.
Eintrag
1
Arkansas verbietet Abtreibung auch nach Vergewaltigung oder Inzest : Der erzkonservative Gouverneur sprach von »Pro-Leben-Überzeugungen«: Im Südstaat Arkansas sollen Abtreibungen bald untersagt sein sogar wenn die Schwangerschaft aus Vergewaltigung oder Inzest resultiert. In: Der Spiegel (online), 2021 (2021-03-10)
2
Chokshi, Niraj ; Taylor, Derrick Bryson :Federal Judge Blocks Arkansas Anti-Abortion Laws for Now : In imposing a temporary ban, the judge wrote that the states three new abortion restrictions may violate the Constitution. In: New York Times, 2019 (2019-07-24)
3
Graw, Ansgar :In Arkansas und Indiana dürfen Gastronomen schwule Kunden abweisen : Kulturkrieg in den USA: Es geht um Homophobie und die jüngere Geschichte, vor allem um den ewigen Gegensatz von Freiheit und Sicherheit In: Die Welt, 2015 (2015-04-02)
4
Phillips, Martha M ; Ryan, Kevin ; Raczynski, James M :Public policy versus individual rights in childhood obesity interventions: perspectives from the Arkansas experience with Act 1220 of 2003. In: Preventing chronic disease, 2011, Vol. 8 (5), A96
5
Griffin, Frankie M. :Setting the stage for quality. In: Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society, 2010, Vol. 106 (10), 220
6
Isaacson, Michael :Seeing the invisible. In: The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society 2010 May ; 106(11): 252-3
7
Joyce, Ted :Parental consent for abortion and the judicial bypass option in Arkansas: effects and correlates. In: Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2010, Vol. 42 (3), 168-75
8
Penn, Casey L :Code: complex. The complex physician-insurance relationship. In: The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society, 2010, Vol. 107 (5), 80-2
9
Penn, Casey L :High learning curve for transplant patients. Patients works to educate patients, physicians and the public. In: The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society, 2010, Vol. 107 (2), 32-4
10
Roberts, Pamela D. :Tiny wonders, huge possibility: Arkansas Act 695 and the stem cell phenomenon In: Arkansas Law Review, 2009, Vol. 61 (4), 673-706
11
Mehta, Paulette et al.: Ethics-in-oncology forums. In: Journal of Cancer Education, 2007, Vol. 22 (3), 159-164
12
Thompson, Joseph W. et al.: Impact of addition of philosophical exemptions on childhood immunization rates. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007, Vol. 32 (3), 194-201
13
Holmes, Steven A. :Abortion-method ruling may spur Supreme Court: appeals panel voids ban on one procedure. [News]. In: , 1999 (1999-09-26)
14
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit: Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Jegley. In: Federal Reporter, 3d Series. 1999 Sep 24 (date of decision). 192: 794-798.
15
Kane, Rosalie A. et al.: Everyday matters in the lives of nursing home residents: wish for and perception of choice and control. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. , 1997, Vol. 45 (9), 1086-1093.
16
Cragan, Janet D. et al.: Surveillance for anencephaly and spina bifida and the impact of prenatal diagnosis -- United States, 1985-1994. In: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. , 1995, Vol. 44 (SS-4), 1-13.
17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit: Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson. In: Federal Reporter, 3d Series. 1995 Jul 25 (date of decision). 60: 497-505.
18
Barta, Kathleen ; Neighbors, Marianne :The Right to Self-Determination. How Arkansas Health Care Institutions Assure that Right In: Director, 1994, Vol. 2 (4), 126-128
19
U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division: Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton. In: Federal Supplement. 1994 Jul 25 (date of decision). 860: 609-631.
20
Barta, Kathleen ; Neighbors, Marianne :Nurses' knowledge of -- and role in -- patients' end-of-life decision-making. In: Trends in Health Care, Law and Ethics. , 1993, Vol. 8 (4), 50-52.